File 009

Ten 'Weird Laws' Still on the Books, Fact-Checked

Lists of weird laws still on the books get shared millions of times, and almost none of them cite a statute. So we went looking for the actual text. This file takes ten famous weird US laws, from ice cream cones in Alabama to Bigfoot in Washington State, and checks each one against state codes, city ordinances, court records and credible fact-checks. The verdict is confirmed when the law is real and in force, solved when it was real but has been repealed or exists in a different form, and debunked when no such law exists.

  1. D
  2. C
  3. D
  4. S
  5. D
  6. S
  7. D
  8. C
  9. C
  10. S
  • 3 confirmed
  • 3 solved
  • 4 debunked

Each square is one case, stamped with its verdict. How we decide verdicts

Opened October 12, 202620 sources
Case 1 of 10AlabamaUnknown

Ice Cream Cones in Back Pockets

Nearly every weird-law list says Alabama makes it illegal to carry an ice cream cone in your back pocket. The usual backstory is that horse thieves once used a cone to lure horses away, so the animal technically followed them by choice and no one could be charged with theft.

It is a great story with no statute behind it. Alabama's criminal code, Title 13A, covers theft, trespass and public nuisances without a word about ice cream. A review by the legal explainer site LegalClarity found no verifiable record of the law in the Alabama Code, and none of the lists that repeat it cite a section number. The horse-luring explanation has never been tied to any real case or code section; it reads like a backstory invented to make the rule sound plausible.

The photographer Olivia Locher, who spent years staging pictures of supposedly real weird laws, told PBS NewsHour that she came to believe the cone rule had once been on the books in Kentucky rather than Alabama. We could not find that statute either. What we can say with confidence is that no current Alabama law forbids a back-pocket cone, and anyone who tries it faces nothing worse than a sticky pair of jeans.

DEBUNKED

Verdict: DebunkedNo Alabama statute or reported ordinance bans carrying an ice cream cone in a pocket, and no list repeating the claim cites one.

Sources (2)
Case 2 of 10Gainesville, Georgia1961

Fried Chicken With a Fork

Gainesville, Georgia, calls itself the Poultry Capital of the World, and in 1961 the city passed an ordinance to prove it. Fried chicken, it declared in effect, is a delicacy to be eaten with the hands. Using a fork is, on paper, an offense.

Unlike most entries on weird-law lists, this one checks out. The Gainesville Times and local lawyers have both described the 1961 ordinance, and it is widely understood to have been a publicity stunt meant to promote the local poultry industry rather than a rule anyone expected to enforce. No repeal has been reported, so it is generally treated as still on the books.

Its most famous enforcement was a joke. A 91-year-old Louisiana visitor named Ginny Dietrick was celebrating her birthday at a Gainesville restaurant when the police chief, Frank Hooper, arrived to arrest her for eating chicken with a fork. A friend had arranged the stunt. The chief solemnly described fried chicken as a culinary delicacy sacred to the city, and then the mayor, Myrtle Figueras, stepped in to pardon her on the spot and invite her back for more chicken. No one has been seriously prosecuted, but the ordinance remains a point of local pride.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedThe 1961 ordinance is real and has not been reported repealed, though it was a promotional stunt and has only been enforced as a joke.

Sources (2)
Case 3 of 10Connecticut1948

Pickles Must Bounce

According to countless lists, a pickle can only legally be sold as a pickle in Connecticut if it bounces. It sounds too silly to be real, and it is not real. But unlike most fake laws, this one has a traceable origin.

In 1948, the Hartford Courant reported on two pickle packers charged with selling pickles unfit to eat. Frederick Holbrook, the state's food and drug commissioner, offered a homespun quality test: drop a pickle about a foot, and if it does not bounce, it is no good. The packers were charged under the state's ordinary food adulteration law, not under any pickle statute. Somewhere along the way, the commissioner's rule of thumb turned into a law in the retelling.

NBC Connecticut's investigative team asked the state directly. Consumer Protection Commissioner Bryan Cafferelli said no such law exists. No Connecticut statute mentions pickles by name; pickled vegetables are covered by the general food, drug and cosmetic rules on adulterated food. The reporters also tested the idea by dropping pickles at a Hartford ballpark from heights up to about 15 feet. Most survived the drop, but a UConn Extension expert explained that a well-preserved pickle is simply firm and crunchy, and probably will not bounce at all.

DEBUNKED

Verdict: DebunkedConnecticut's consumer protection commissioner says no pickle-bounce law exists; the idea grew from a 1948 official's offhand quality test.

Sources (1)
Case 4 of 10Kentucky1966

Dyed Ducklings for Sale

Weird-law lists like to say that in Kentucky you cannot dye a duckling blue and sell it unless you are selling more than six at once. That is a garbled version of a real statute, and the real one makes more sense.

Kentucky Revised Statutes section 436.600, created in 1966 and amended in 1972, does two separate things. First, it bans dyeing or coloring baby chicks, ducklings, other fowl or rabbits, and it bans selling, trading, displaying or even possessing ones that have been dyed. There is no exception for bulk orders: dyed ducklings are out, period. Second, it bars selling or giving away baby birds or rabbits under two months old in groups smaller than six, with an exception allowing rabbits weighing at least three pounds to be sold at six weeks. Violations carry a fine of $100 to $500.

The statute does not spell out its purpose, but its effect is plain: no coloring young animals as novelties, and no selling very young birds or rabbits one or two at a time. The internet merged those two clauses into a single absurd rule about blue ducklings in bulk. The actual statute, minus the joke, is on the books today.

SOLVED

Verdict: SolvedKRS 436.600 is real and in force, but it bans dyed ducklings outright; the six-animal minimum is a separate rule for undyed young animals.

Sources (2)
Case 5 of 10Arizona1920s (claimed)

Donkeys Sleeping in Bathtubs

This one comes with its own legend. Sometime in the 1920s, the story goes, a donkey in Kingman, Arizona, fell asleep in an old bathtub, a flood swept it away, and the townspeople spent so much effort rescuing it that the town banned donkeys from sleeping in bathtubs. Later versions upgrade it to a statewide law.

No one has ever produced the text. A review by LegalClarity found no matching ordinance in Kingman's municipal code or anywhere in Arizona law. The Phoenix New Times, which went through ten famous Arizona dumb laws, rated the donkey rule as not a law and noted that the origin story is just that, a story. It shares a list with other Arizona inventions such as a supposed crime of refusing someone a glass of water, which the same paper called the state's biggest legal urban legend.

The donkey tale has a structure common to fake laws: a specific town, a vague decade, and a funny incident that supposedly forced lawmakers' hands. That is the tell. Real ordinances leave paper trails in council minutes and municipal codes. This one has only been passed around in joke books and websites, and no date, council vote or code section has ever been attached to it.

DEBUNKED

Verdict: DebunkedNo Kingman ordinance or Arizona statute matching the claim has ever been found, and the flood story has no documentation.

Sources (2)
Case 6 of 10Michigan1897–2015

No Cursing in Front of Women and Children

For more than a century, Michigan law made it a misdemeanor to use indecent, immoral, obscene, vulgar or insulting language in the presence or hearing of any woman or child. It sounds like a joke-list invention, but it was real, and someone was actually convicted under it.

In August 1998, Timothy Boomer tumbled out of his canoe on the Rifle River and let loose a stream of profanity. A family with two young children was within earshot, and a sheriff's deputy cited him under the 1897 law. A jury convicted him in 1999, and he was sentenced to a $75 fine and four days of community service in a child care program, though the sentence was put on hold during his appeal. The press dubbed him the cussing canoeist.

The American Civil Liberties Union took his case, and on April 1, 2002, the Michigan Court of Appeals threw out the conviction. The court found the law unconstitutionally vague, warning that a ban on insulting language could expose a huge share of the population to criminal charges. The ruling made the statute effectively unenforceable, but it stayed in the books until 2015, when Michigan lawmakers repealed it along with other outdated laws in a cleanup package signed that December.

SOLVED

Verdict: SolvedThe 1897 law was real and produced a 1999 conviction, but a 2002 appeals ruling gutted it and Michigan repealed it in 2015.

Sources (3)
Case 7 of 10TexasUnknown

Criminals Must Give 24 Hours' Notice

One of the most widely shared weird laws claims that in Texas, anyone planning a crime must give the victim 24 hours' notice, either in writing or out loud. It turns up on trivia sites and even on law firm blogs, usually presented as a law still in effect.

No such law exists, and it would make no sense if it did. Criminal statutes define offenses and penalties; they do not set up a courtesy notice system for offenders. The claim circulates on law firm blogs and trivia sites, typically with no statute number attached, and lists that present it as real cite nothing. When the NPR quiz show Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! put it to actor and Texas native Matthew McConaughey, he correctly flagged it as fake.

Texas does have a real advance-notice law, just not for criminals. On the same show, the panel confirmed that Texas requires advance public notice, published in newspapers weeks ahead of time, before anyone conducts weather modification such as cloud seeding. It is an actual notice requirement, just for rainmakers rather than robbers. The lesson for readers: when a weird law sounds like a punch line and nobody cites a code section, it is almost always a punch line.

DEBUNKED

Verdict: DebunkedNo Texas statute requires notice before a crime; the claim is never sourced to any code section.

Sources (2)
Case 8 of 10New Jersey1949–present

No Pumping Your Own Gas

Visitors to New Jersey sometimes pull up to a gas pump, reach for the nozzle and get waved off by an attendant. It feels like a quirk, but it is the law, and New Jersey is now the only state in the country that bans self-service gas everywhere.

The ban dates to 1949 and the state's Retail Gasoline Dispensing Safety Act. The original rationale was safety: trained attendants know where the emergency shutoffs are, can spot hazards, make sure engines are off and nobody is smoking, and only fill approved containers. State officials also point to keeping higher-risk people, such as seniors and pregnant women, away from gasoline vapors, and the rule supports thousands of attendant jobs at the state's roughly 1,900 stations.

For decades New Jersey had company. Oregon passed its own full-service law in 1951, but it allowed self-service in parts of the state and then softened its restrictions further in 2023. That left New Jersey alone, with attendants still a fixture at every station. Of all the laws in this file, this is the one most likely to affect an ordinary traveler.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedNew Jersey's 1949 Retail Gasoline Dispensing Safety Act still bars self-service gas, making it the only state with a total ban.

Sources (2)
Case 9 of 10Arkansas1881

Mispronouncing Arkansas

The internet says it is illegal to mispronounce Arkansas while in Arkansas. That overstates it, but there really is an official pronunciation written into state law, and it has been there since 1881.

By the late 1800s, people were arguing about whether the name should be said AR-kan-saw or ar-KAN-zas, the second pronunciation rhyming with Kansas. To settle it, the state's historical society and the Eclectic Society of Little Rock looked into the question, and in 1881 the General Assembly adopted a concurrent resolution. It declares that the true pronunciation is the one the French learned from Native peoples: three syllables, the final s silent, an Italian a sound in each syllable, with the accent on the first and last syllables. It calls the Kansas-style pronunciation an innovation to be discouraged.

That resolution was carried forward through successive codes and today sits in the Arkansas Code as section 1-4-105. Notice what it does not do. It sets no penalty and makes nothing a crime. It applies to oral official proceedings, and it reads more like a style guide than a criminal law. So the law is real and still on the books, but no one is getting arrested for an extra z.

CONFIRMED

Verdict: ConfirmedArkansas Code section 1-4-105 sets the official pronunciation; it is in force, but it carries no penalty for saying it wrong.

Sources (1)
Case 10 of 10Skamania County, Washington1969–present

Killing Bigfoot

On April 1, 1969, the commissioners of Skamania County, Washington, passed Ordinance 69-01, making it illegal to kill a Sasquatch, described in the ordinance as a nocturnal primate mammal. Despite the date, it was no April Fools' joke. It was published twice in the local newspaper as the law required.

The commissioners said they were worried about an influx of investigators and hunters, many armed, drawn to the county by reported sightings. The original ordinance made a willful killing a felony punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 and up to five years in prison. That is the version most weird-law lists still quote.

It changed in 1984. Ordinance 1984-2 downgraded the crime to a gross misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a fine of up to $1,000, declared the entire county a Sasquatch Refuge and listed the creature as an endangered species there. It also covered an awkward possibility: if the coroner ever ruled a victim humanoid, prosecutors would treat the case as a homicide. The ordinance has not been repealed. Whatcom County, farther north, adopted a nonbinding resolution in 1992 declaring itself a Sasquatch protection and refuge area. Neither law has ever had a victim to protect, but both are real.

SOLVED

Verdict: SolvedThe Bigfoot ordinance is real and in force, but the famous felony and $10,000 fine were replaced in 1984 with lighter penalties.

Sources (3)

The rule of thumb is simple: a real law has a section number, and a fake one has a funny backstory instead. When a list gives you only the story, keep your ice cream cone in your hand and your skepticism close.

Which case is the strangest?

Cast your vote to see how everyone else ruled.

Think you'd ace the quiz?

Try the US States Quiz on our sister site, QuizPlays.

Play the quiz

Pass this file along

Know someone who'd argue with a verdict?