File 018

Ten Strange Sounds Scientists Recorded and Couldn't Identify

Hydrophones, radio telescopes and ordinary ears have all caught noises nobody could explain at first. This file collects ten strange sounds scientists recorded and couldn't identify, from the Bloop that rumbled across the Pacific to a cosmic radio signal that earned a scribbled "Wow!" in the margin. Some have since been traced to icebergs, whales, crickets or a steel mill. Others are still open. Each entry gets a verdict: solved when the source has been identified with good evidence, unsolved when it hasn't.

  1. S
  2. S
  3. U
  4. S
  5. U
  6. S
  7. U
  8. S
  9. U
  10. U
  • 5 solved
  • 5 unsolved

Each square is one case, stamped with its verdict. How we decide verdicts

Opened October 12, 202621 sources
Case 1 of 10South Pacific Ocean1997

The Bloop

In the summer of 1997, underwater microphones operated by NOAA's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory picked up an extremely loud, low-frequency sound. The hydrophones were there to listen for undersea volcanoes and earthquakes. This was something else, and it was powerful enough to register on sensors more than 3,000 miles (5,000 km) apart. Researchers nicknamed it the Bloop.

The internet did the rest. Because the sound seemed so enormous, people proposed a giant squid, an unknown sea creature, secret military hardware and, inevitably, a monster out of horror fiction. The nickname and the mystery made it one of the most famous recordings in ocean science.

The real answer came from patience. In the years that followed, NOAA moved hydrophones closer to Antarctica and recorded many icequakes: the sounds of huge icebergs cracking and breaking apart. Their acoustic signatures looked strikingly similar to the Bloop. NOAA now describes the Bloop as consistent with an icequake, and in 2005 its researchers traced the sound to ice cracking and calving off Antarctica. The likely source lay somewhere between the Bransfield Strait and the Ross Sea. No monster required, just a very large piece of ice breaking in a very quiet ocean.

SOLVED

Verdict: SolvedNOAA matched the Bloop's acoustic signature to icequakes from cracking Antarctic icebergs.

Sources (2)
Case 2 of 10Southern Ocean and off Western Australia1960s–2014

The Bio-Duck

Starting in the 1960s, submarine crews in the waters around Antarctica kept hearing a strange, rhythmic sound. It came in repeating bursts of low pulses that, to human ears, sounded a bit like a duck quacking. The submariners called it the bio-duck. For roughly five decades, it showed up again and again on recordings across the Southern Ocean, especially in the southern winter, and off Western Australia too. No one could say what was making it.

The bio-duck was not a one-off oddity like many sounds in this file. It was common and regular, which made the mystery more frustrating. Scientists suspected an animal, but the obvious candidates had never been caught in the act. Without seeing the source while it made the sound, they could not prove anything.

The break came in February 2013, when researchers attached acoustic recording tags to two Antarctic minke whales in Wilhelmina Bay, off the western Antarctic Peninsula. One tag recorded bio-duck sounds just before the whale began a feeding dive. In a 2014 paper in the journal Biology Letters, the team described this as conclusive evidence that Antarctic minke whales make the sound. The solution matters beyond curiosity: scientists can now use decades of archived recordings to track a whale species that lives in hard-to-reach sea ice.

SOLVED

Verdict: SolvedAcoustic tags placed on Antarctic minke whales in 2013 recorded the bio-duck, identifying the species behind it.

Sources (1)
Case 3 of 10South Pacific Ocean1991–present

Upsweep

When NOAA scientists began recording with the U.S. Navy's underwater listening network, known as SOSUS, in August 1991, a strange sound was already there. It was a long train of narrow-band tones, each lasting a few seconds and rising in pitch, like a slow siren repeating over and over. They called it Upsweep.

Upsweep was loud enough to be detected across the entire Pacific Ocean. NOAA roughly located its source in a remote stretch of the South Pacific near 54 degrees south latitude, 140 degrees west longitude, far from any coast. The sound also behaves oddly over time. It tends to peak in spring and fall, though researchers cannot say whether that reflects a change at the source or seasonal changes in how sound travels through the ocean. Its overall volume has dropped since 1991, but it can still be picked up.

Early ideas that a whale might be responsible were set aside, partly because the sound's tonal pattern was considered too limited for an animal. Because the source sits near an area of inferred volcanic activity, NOAA scientists suspect underwater volcanism. That remains a hypothesis, and NOAA itself describes the origin as unresolved. More than three decades later, nobody has pinned it down.

UNSOLVED

Verdict: UnsolvedVolcanic activity is the leading suspect, but NOAA lists Upsweep's origin as unresolved.

Sources (2)
Case 4 of 10Havana, Cuba2016–2019

The Havana Embassy Recording

Beginning in late 2016, U.S. diplomats in Havana reported a range of troubling symptoms, and some described hearing strange, grating noises before they fell ill. The Associated Press later released a recording that personnel said captured the sound: a continuous, high-pitched electronic-seeming whine. Speculation turned to sonic or microwave weapons. The health episodes became known as Havana syndrome.

In early 2019, the biologists Alexander Stubbs and Fernando Montealegre-Z analyzed the AP recording. Its dominant frequency, about 7 kilohertz, and its precisely repeating pulse rate closely matched the calling song of the Indies short-tailed cricket, a Caribbean insect, with echoes added as the sound bounced off indoor surfaces. They concluded the recording most likely captured crickets, not a device, while stressing that their work did not explain what caused anyone's symptoms.

That broader question has drawn separate investigations. In 2024, two National Institutes of Health studies found no MRI-detectable brain injury in the affected group, though NIH stressed the symptoms were real. U.S. intelligence assessments in 2023 and 2025 judged it very unlikely that a foreign adversary was responsible for most cases, though not every agency agreed. The verdict here applies only to the recording itself.

SOLVED

Verdict: SolvedAcoustic analysis matched the released recording to a Caribbean cricket's song; the cause of the reported symptoms is a separate question.

Sources (3)
Case 5 of 10Taos, New Mexico, and worldwide1970s–present

The Hum

Some people describe it as a diesel engine idling somewhere in the distance. Others call it a low drone or rumble that seems louder indoors and at night. It has been reported in Britain, the United States, Canada, Australia and elsewhere, and it is known simply as the Hum. The catch is that most people standing in the same spot hear nothing at all.

The most famous American case is the Taos Hum in New Mexico, which drew attention in the early 1990s. According to reports summarized by researchers, at least 2 percent of Taos residents said they could hear it, and each described a slightly different pitch, generally between 32 and 80 hertz. Investigators never found a source. A 1973 university study of 50 people who complained of a hum found it was heard most often in cool weather, early in the morning.

Some local hums have been traced to real machinery, such as a vacuum pump in West Seattle and an electrical substation near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Many others have not. Researchers have proposed low-frequency tinnitus, sounds produced by the ear itself, distant industrial noise and heightened attention to ordinary background sound. The likeliest answer is that the Hum is not one thing but several, and for most reported cases, the source remains unknown.

UNSOLVED

Verdict: UnsolvedA few local hums have been traced to machinery, but no single source explains the Taos Hum or most reports.

Sources (2)
Case 6 of 10Windsor, Ontario, and Detroit River2011–2020

The Windsor Hum

In 2011, residents of Windsor, Ontario, began reporting a low, throbbing rumble. Some said it rattled their windows and dishes and kept them awake. At one point, around 22,000 people had complained. Unlike many hums, this one seemed to have a direction: it pointed across the Detroit River toward Zug Island, a heavily industrialized island on the Michigan side, home to a U.S. Steel mill.

That was a hard lead to follow. Zug Island is private, guarded and closed to outsiders, and Canadian researchers commissioned to study the noise were not allowed to take measurements there. Using microphones placed around Windsor, they concluded the sound most likely came from the island, but they could not prove it. Puzzlingly, the steel mill had operated for about a century, and officials said no new equipment had started up when the noise began.

Then came a natural experiment. U.S. Steel announced in late 2019 that it was winding down operations on Zug Island, and its blast furnaces were shut down by April 2020. Reports of the hum stopped. A researcher involved in the Canadian study said he knew of no evidence that the hum had continued. Exactly which piece of equipment caused it, and why it started in 2011, was never publicly established.

SOLVED

Verdict: SolvedThe hum was traced toward Zug Island's steel mill and stopped when its blast furnaces shut down in 2020.

Sources (2)
Case 7 of 10North Pacific Ocean1989–present

The 52-Hertz Whale

In 1989, a team at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution picked up a whale call on U.S. Navy hydrophones that did not fit any known species. It sounded like a baleen whale song, but it was pitched at about 52 hertz. Blue whales and fin whales typically call far lower, roughly 10 to 40 hertz. The same distinctive voice kept turning up in 1990 and 1991, and once the Navy opened its listening network to researchers in the early 1990s, scientists could follow it.

Over about 12 years, the oceanographer William Watkins and colleagues tracked the calls across the North Pacific. The singer appeared each year roughly from August through December, roaming between the waters off Alaska's Aleutian and Kodiak Islands and the California coast. Its call deepened slightly over time. The press dubbed it the loneliest whale in the world, imagining an animal that no other whale could hear.

Scientists are more cautious. Some suspect it is a hybrid, perhaps part blue whale, or an animal with an unusual voice. Others note that whales can probably still hear it. In 2010, similar calls were detected on widely separated sensors off California, suggesting there may be more than one. No one has ever confirmed a sighting of the singer.

UNSOLVED

Verdict: UnsolvedThe calls almost certainly come from a whale, but its species and identity remain unconfirmed and it has never been seen.

Sources (2)
Case 8 of 10Off Antarctica, heard in the equatorial Pacific1997 and 1999

Julia and Slow Down

On May 19, 1997, NOAA's hydrophones in the eastern equatorial Pacific recorded a sound that slowly dropped in pitch over about seven minutes, like a machine winding down. Researchers called it Slow Down. Less than two years later, on March 1, 1999, the same network caught another eerie signal, an eerie sound nearly three minutes long that was nicknamed Julia. Both were loud enough to be heard thousands of miles from where they began.

For a while, both joined the list of unexplained ocean noises, and online speculation filled the gap. NOAA's researchers had a more down-to-earth candidate: ice. They traced Slow Down to the waters off the Antarctic Peninsula, an area crowded with islands and shoals, and concluded that it was highly probable it came from a large iceberg running aground. The falling pitch matches a drifting iceberg scraping to a stop on the seafloor.

Julia got a similar explanation. NOAA says its most likely source was a large iceberg grounding off Antarctica, the same kind of event as Slow Down. Because the direction of arrival was uncertain, Julia's origin could lie anywhere between the Bransfield Strait and Cape Adare. Researchers have since recorded similar signals many times as big icebergs ground, which is a strong sign the explanation fits.

SOLVED

Verdict: SolvedNOAA attributes both sounds to large icebergs grounding on the seafloor off Antarctica, a pattern recorded many times since.

Sources (2)
Case 9 of 10Seneca Lake, New York, and the Carolinas coast1800s–present

Skyquakes and the Seneca Guns

Imagine a calm, clear day by a lake or a beach, and then a deep boom like distant cannon fire, with no storm and no explosion in sight. Around Seneca Lake in New York's Finger Lakes, such sounds have been reported for generations and are called the Seneca Guns. The novelist James Fenimore Cooper wrote about them in an 1850 story, which helped spread the name. Similar booms are reported along the coasts of North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia, and around the world under other names, such as the Barisal guns of Bangladesh.

They are not new. In July 1805, near the Great Falls of the Missouri in present-day Montana, Meriwether Lewis and William Clark both recorded hearing booms like a cannon fired a few miles away. Neither could explain them, according to the National Park Service.

The U.S. Geological Survey says most mysterious booms turn out to have human causes, such as explosions, construction or sonic booms from aircraft. Some are linked to small, shallow earthquakes that can produce a loud boom with little or no shaking. Other proposed natural causes include gas escaping from lake beds, distant thunder and meteors. No single explanation covers every report, and many individual booms are never traced to a source.

UNSOLVED

Verdict: UnsolvedSome booms have known causes like shallow quakes or aircraft, but many skyquakes, including the Seneca Guns, remain unexplained.

Sources (3)
Case 10 of 10Big Ear Radio Observatory, OhioAugust 15, 1977

The Wow! Signal

Not every strange sound is a sound. On August 15, 1977, Ohio State University's Big Ear radio telescope, scanning the sky during a routine survey for signs of alien transmissions, logged a strong, narrow-band radio signal. Volunteer astronomer Jerry Ehman later spotted it on the computer printout, next to the code 6EQUJ5, and wrote Wow! beside it in red ink. The name stuck.

The signal had several tantalizing features. Its frequency sat close to the natural emission line of hydrogen, around 1,420 megahertz, a natural landmark on the radio dial. Big Ear relied on Earth's rotation to sweep the sky, so it could watch any single point for only 72 seconds. The signal rose and fell across that window in just the way a fixed source in deep space would, rather than interference drifting through. It appeared to come from the constellation Sagittarius.

Then it was gone. Repeated searches with other telescopes never caught it again, and a signal that never repeats is almost impossible to study. Proposed explanations have included comets, which astronomers rejected, and a 2024 hypothesis that a cold hydrogen cloud briefly brightened when energized by a stellar source. That idea is still unconfirmed. Nearly 50 years later, the Wow! signal remains the most famous unexplained radio event in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.

UNSOLVED

Verdict: UnsolvedThe signal never repeated, and no natural, human or alien explanation has been confirmed.

Sources (2)

Most mysterious noises end up being ice, animals or industry, which is its own kind of wonder. The few that stay open are a reminder of how much of the ocean and sky is still unlistened to.

Which case is the strangest?

Cast your vote to see how everyone else ruled.

Think you'd ace the quiz?

Try the Ocean & Sea Life Quiz on our sister site, QuizPlays.

Play the quiz

Pass this file along

Know someone who'd argue with a verdict?